Protest Against Animal Cruelty

A protest to end animal cruelty was held today, 14th December.  The protest was organised by WEEAC – Malta™ (Worldwide Events to End Animal Cruelty).  The protest was held after a horse was beaten by its owner in May and although the person has been caught, nothing concrete was revealed and everything is still pending.

10849722_840737805983007_6485504244614470259_n

10868224_840737809316340_4169186618360103237_n       10868257_840737762649678_8819112500027809717_n

Therefore, a protest was held to raise awareness of the current situation on animal cruelty in Malta.  The protest lasted for one hour and several animal lovers joined the one hour long walk which started at 14:00hrs in Sliema and ended in St. Julians.

We want justice now.  Animal cruelty is a crime!  Our message is clear: Stop animal cruelty!

Pascal Aloisio (ADZ Malta Green Youth Executive Member)

Advertisements

Human Rights Day: Remembering the “Boat People” and Reclaiming Our Humanity

Today, the world commemorates the United Nations’ landmark achievement of creating of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

As the cold winter starts to cloud over the Mediterranean, the tragedies that cost countless of human lives over the past summer appear too distance itself from the attention of the people. And that is a tragedy in itself.

A lot of search-and-rescue operations of the so-called “boat people” have been carried out in the Mediterranean by the EU’s Frontex and Italy’s Mare Nostrum. These individuals usually originate from sub-Saharan African countries – although recently there have been arrivals from Palestine and Syria.

What stories do these people carry? A number of them are desperate victims of human trafficking, but most, if not all, subsequently become victims of an inhumane system inconsistent with human rights principles. International law obligates nations to provide asylum to people whose return to their countries of origin would mean possible persecution or death. But for some countries, that notion is just hard to accept.

The anti-immigration movement, mostly composed of right-wingers and populist politicians, unfortunately do not care about human lives. Never mind their political incorrectness in labeling refugees who exercise their right to flee as “illegal”, but their xenophobic rhetoric to attract voters; to appease the people’s delusions rather than follow proper human rights protocols are just some of the things that make today’s society a dark and sad one.

The anti-immigration sentiment is happening because as time passes, the counterproductive effects of the Dublin Regulation are felt. The disadvantageous implication of the Dublin Regulation is that any refugee who lands in an EU member state for the first time must apply their asylum claim in that state.

This naturally results to the downside that a high burden is put on southern EU states, which are either too small or undergoing a political and economic crisis themselves. Northern European states, on the other hand, are comfortable putting their proverbial heads in the sand.

While the south is undergoing such an amount of stress to deal with this massive humanitarian crisis, there is a growing urge for the EU to reform some of its policies. For starters, the Dublin regulation needs to be repealed and asylum seekers must be fairly distributed among all member states.

The stories surrounding the Mediterranean boat people are a never-ending tragedy. The parts of these stories we see; the drownings, the rescue operations, the asylum claims, etc. are just the tip of the iceberg – It’s just a small evident aspect of something largely hidden, since the situation has a deeper facet: trafficking rings, wars, social and economic turmoil are happening, both outside and within our territory.

And it is Europe’s duty to not only ensure the fundamental human rights of refugees to shelter and asylum, but they also have the duty to minimize the atrocities outside their territory. The international community, which includes civil society and all citizens, has to abide by their moral duty to reduce these problems; problems that put our humanity on the line.

http://www.ecosprinter.eu/migration-culture-and-identity/2014/12/10/human-rights-day-remembering-the-boat-people-and-reclaiming-our-humanity/

By Anna Azzopardi (FYEG, ADŻ Malta Green Youth) & Joshua Miguel Makalintal (FYEG, Junge Grüne)

Fort Campbell

Fort Campbell is a fortification situated at Selmun.  It was built by the British in the late 1930s and was the last of the British forts which were built before the Second World War.  The polygonal ramparts and concrete bunkers of Fort Campbell are typical structures of fortifications of the 19th and 20th Century.

0        10849007_835040273219427_7439610502225583684_o 10838227_835036919886429_5403362203284615221_o

One might think that such a large and historically important monument is well preserved and that it is kept in a good condition.  However, the opposite is the case.  What one may encounter when visiting this magnificent place is nothing but a sense of neglect.  The old fortification is literally falling apart with roofs of the buildings collapsing, rotting wooden frames and rusting metal beams and gun posts.

10830942_835041519885969_7884357578491079366_o  10714153_835039943219460_437557023118234956_o

10683720_835037013219753_3844246729693240425_o  10633495_835039389886182_50099026545502065_o

Another thing one may notice when visiting Fort Campbell is the substantial amount of litter across the whole fort.  Plastics, papers, food wastes, construction waste and all sorts of other wastes were simply dumped in this site of cultural heritage.

Untitled         10005912_835040779886043_2618666261155793685_o

1913260_835041553219299_3485749575598655202_o

ADZ Malta Green Youth calls for immediate action to conserve and restore this historical site.  We would like to raise awareness of how important this site is.  Several tourists come to visit this place and the surrounding area.  One can also enjoy a stunning view on Mistra Bay, Selmun and Saint Paul’s Islands.  It would therefore be vital to rehabilitate the area to its former glory.  However, this should be done in a sustainable manner, meaning that the buildings should be constructed as they were before and the surrounding area, which has now become a green area characterised by Maltese garrigue and maquis, should not be damaged and removed.

1 10457654_835040963219358_610427554940073978_o

Over time, various indigenous species have colonised the rocky areas inside the fort.  Therefore, Fort Campbell should be restored in an environmentally sound manner and should also be enjoyed as a natural green area.  Buildings and structures should be restored and footpaths could be established around the vegetated areas.  The government’s latest plans to rehabilitate Fort Campbell should be done in a sustainable manner and several points should also be considered before the place can be rehabilitated.

2       1512176_835040763219378_3768681864001442895_o

We also encourage the general public to visit this cultural landscape and its exquisite surrounding environment.

Interesting link for further information: http://www.militaryarchitecture.com/index.php/Fortifications/fort-campbell.html

Pascal Aloisio (ADZ Malta Green Youth Executive Member)

A bridge gets us nowhere, time to think of more viable solutions.

In the past few days we as ADZ Malta decided to voice our concerns on the possibility of a massive bridge being built to link Malta with its sister island Gozo. This must be seen in light of the results of the feasibility study carried out by the China Communications Constructions Company (CCCC), published earlier this week in Maltese media outlets. I won’t delve into the merits and demerits of having a Chinese company, blacklisted by the World Bank (mind you) carry out such a study; that’s another matter altogether. Nor shall I go into how and why the proposal is inherently unsustainable (on all fronts, be it economical, environmental, social or cultural); my colleague Pascal Aloisio did just that in his previous blog post, and honestly there is very little to add.

What I’ll try to do in this brief contribution is list few of the more sound alternatives to a permanent bridge between the two main islands of the Maltese Archipelago. Prime Minister Joseph Muscat has proclaimed that a bridge or tunnel is a ‘must’, but is it?

Unfortunately, there has been a worrying recent trend where anyone who openly criticises Government decisions and appointments has been branded as ‘negative’ by the ‘Taghna Lkoll’ administration. Not only is this a blatant attack on the fundamental right of free speech, but it ignores the fact that obligatory constructive criticism makes no sense at all. Watching Muscat’s reaction to the Opposition leader’s budget remarks was almost a comical affair, how can he expect a weakened Opposition, with very little intellectual resources to dispose of, to come up with solutions of its own to the pressing macro-economic budgetary dilemmas of our time? It’s not in its capacity and it’s not its duty to do so. However, we at ADZ Malta Green Youth are going a step further, and would like to outline some better propositions the Government should consider when addressing the Gozo link conundrum.

1) A tunnel linking the islands.

Whilst being much more aesthetically pleasing than a permanent bridge, the challenges a potential tunnel will face will be numerous. Many have argued that Malta does not have the engineering expertise to commission such an infrastructural project, and past experiences have shown us that the Public Sector has failed time after time in successfully constructing and maintaining infrastructural developments of a much smaller scale. The mind boggles at the prospect of having local construction companies dealing with such an intrepid engineering feat, given their track record of inefficiency and poor planning. The Government will unfortunately have to look at issuing tenders aimed at foreign Consortiums and companies to construct the tunnel, this will inflate the price of the project whilst minimising the money trickling down back into our local economy. Given our worrying figures when it comes to national debt, this would be somewhat unwise.

Leaving all this aside, the possibility of a tunnel being built in the channel between Malta and Gozo is further hindered by the fact that the geology of the seabed of the channel would complicate matters further. In the May of 2012, geologist Dr.Peter Gatt made it unequivocally clear that digging through the fault lines found in the subterranean rock formations would be “fatal” . I personally believe that albeit these quasi-impossibilities do subsist, the prospect of a tunnel cannot be completely discarded. It can be seen as the lesser of two evils, especially when one puts the possibility of a bridge on the other side of the weighing scale.

2)  A complete revamp of the Gozo Channel ferry system.

Although I do not agree with the Government’s means in achieving the end of changing the current communications’ facilities between the islands, it is recommendable that finally someone is taking the issue seriously. The past administration’s pre-feasibility study on the tunnel coupled with the current efforts are a good start, however it is disappointing that both parties in Government have overlooked what is probably the easiest and most sustainable route.

It’s becoming almost customary that every successive Prime Minister is hellbent on having their ego fulfilled by building a monumental landmark (cashed out of the taxpayers’ wallet of course) that would cement his or her name in Maltese folklore permanently. The bridge or tunnel may be another such exercise of power to fulfill a leader’s ego, but what can be equally fulfilling; is the concept of salvaging the Gozo Channel’s future, and with it the fate of 200 employees and their respective families. Currently Gozitans commuting on a daily or weekly basis to and fro, find the Gozo Channel schedule unrealistic (especially in the early mornings), the trip’s duration far too lengthy and the traffic and distance from Mellieha to their destinations unsupportable. Especially if the same destinations lie somewhere in the Central or Northern Harbour area district, the Maltese equivalent of Dante’s seventh ring of hell during rush hours.

I believe that a new and improved fleet of smaller and faster vessels should be on the Government’s cards. A possible change in the route should also be seriously considered. Yes, this would draw enormous criticism due to the implications this would purport, especially when the change in final arrival point would render past and present investments in embellishing the Cirkewwa Terminal virtually useless. Having said that, it is logical that by substituting Cirkewwa for Valletta as the destination for commuters it would make life easier for said commuters and prevent further traffic issues in the north of the island. However, how would one reconcile the added pressure exerted upon the infrastructure of the Central Harbour District within a more holistic strategy for reducing traffic congestion and increasing quality of life for Gozitan commuters and Maltese citizens alike?

That’s where an efficient and well planned integrated public transport system comes in. Imagine having a fast and reliable ferry transport system linking Gozitans to Malta by taking them directly to the heart of the country (Valletta), coupled with an equally fast and reliable public system that would connect their port of call with their destination of choice. If we were to go a step further and think about how we can possibly further reduce the carbon footprint of the Gozitan commute we can look at how Hong Kong (ironically part of China) are powering their ferry boats with solar (yes, solar) energy. Can we actually achieve this? If Muscat does believe we can and should be the best in Europe then yes we should consider being avantgarde. . Of course I’m being idealistic, and I’m bordering into fantasy land, but I’m not venturing into unchartered territory. The idea of a bridge or tunnel solving all of Gozo’s problems is in my opinion, far, far more unrealistic than optimizing the Gozo Channel service.

My last suggestion to PM Muscat is simple. Persevering with the short-sighted idea of a permanent link (be it bridge or tunnel), can prove successful in terms of immediate re-election, as I’m sure many inpatient Gozitans and PL aficionados will greet the completion of such a project as a clear sign of political might. But on the long term, this project may make or break the future of Gozo, and by permanently linking it with Malta, the State may be exerting disproportionate pressures on a small island with a unique Mediterranean character. Not to mention losing millions of Euros in EU ‘double insularity’ funds. The Honourable Joseph must keep in mind that present generations may hail his name for the unprecedented build, but future generations will inevitably curse his name if things turn sour. We cannot let Gozo be irreversibly ruined by development, and as a resident of the Central Harbour District myself, I believe I know fairly well how hard the consequences of over-development can hit.

Stefan Cutajar (ADZ Malta Green Youth Deputy Chairperson)